{"id":170,"date":"2014-08-17T14:15:22","date_gmt":"2014-08-17T21:15:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/torrancecitycouncil.com\/?p=170"},"modified":"2014-08-17T21:14:51","modified_gmt":"2014-08-18T04:14:51","slug":"union-strength-flexes-its-muscle-under-mayor-furey-and-new-council","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/torrancecitycouncil.com\/?p=170","title":{"rendered":"Union Strength Flexes its Muscle Under Mayor Furey and New Council"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/torrancecitycouncil.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/AFSCME.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright  wp-image-176\" src=\"http:\/\/torrancecitycouncil.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/AFSCME.jpg\" alt=\"AFSCME\" width=\"262\" height=\"259\" \/><\/a>The City Council is expected to formally approve this coming Tuesday a labor agreement with AFSCME and two smaller collective bargaining units representing library employees and crossing guards.\u00a0 The agreement includes a $261,000 thousand payment for retroactive pay and a three month accelerated promotion on the back end of the deal at a cost of $185,000.\u00a0 Former Mayor Scotto and Councilmember Sutherland criticized the agreement in a recent <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailybreeze.com\/government-and-politics\/20140810\/torrance-city-council-may-award-261000-payout-to-union#disqus_thread\" target=\"_blank\">Daily Breeze<\/a> article claiming it was an indicator that that the unions would be running the show in Torrance.<\/p>\n<p>The payments in and of themselves are significant as the City is currently operating under a tight budget.\u00a0 The much larger concern, however, is the precedent the payouts set for future labor negotiations.\u00a0 These payouts represent something more than what other City Public Employee Unions received in recent agreements and those unions will almost certainly press for the same treatment in future negotiations.\u00a0 Agreeing to the payouts essentially eliminates key leverage City officials have in labor negotiations.\u00a0 Without the threat of delayed pay increases due to stalled labor negotiations, the unions can hold out on other contractual provisions until they get what they want.\u00a0 This weakened negotiation position could force City officials to concede on contractual points that they might otherwise fight.<\/p>\n<p>One of these lesser known contractual provisions included in the proposed agreement is called \u201cRelease time.\u201d\u00a0 This common provision in labor negotiated agreements is designed to allow employees paid time-off to participate in union activities such as meeting with management, holding negotiations, or attending union meetings and hearings on personnel matters.\u00a0 The practice has been harshly criticized by some, including one legislator found <a href=\"http:\/\/capitalresearch.org\/2013\/02\/official-time-taxpayers-paying-for-union-work-is-officially-a-scam\/\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a> who claims that \u201creceiving a taxpayer funded salary to be nothing more than a political operative for a union organization is inherently wrong.\u201d\u00a0\u00a0 The co-author of Shadowbosses is quoted in the same article as stating that:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOfficial [Release] time is a ruse for getting taxpayers to support union activities in the government workplace, including the lobbying of legislators for ever-more benefits. This effectively subsidizes unions so they can spend more dues income on political organizing. And it\u2019s all done without taxpayers\u2019 knowledge. It\u2019s a shadowy practice that must be stopped.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The proposed Torrance agreement takes the common \u201cRelease Time\u201d provision a step further by allowing the Union President \u201cpaid release time of two days per week [Tuesday and Wednesday] to conduct Union activities.\u201d\u00a0 This paid release time is in addition to the release time typically afforded by the Clause.\u00a0 The provision also allows the Union President to receive overtime pay for conducting City business during scheduled release time days.<\/p>\n<p>This provision was included not only in the AFSCME agreement, but in that with the Torrance Library Employee Association (TLEA) as well, which represents 88 City library employees.\u00a0 City officials have provided no details as to what union activities would require the TLEA Union President\u2019s attention for a minimum of 16 hours per week.<\/p>\n<p>Increased union strength under the new Council should not be unexpected to Torrance Residents.\u00a0 Mayor Furey, and the rest of the recently elected Council (Councilmembers Ashcraft, Weideman, Goodrich, and Rizzo), relied heavily on Union support to win the election.\u00a0 Councilmember Goodrich is currently employed by the California Association of Public Employees (CAPE) and Mayor Furey and Councilmember Rizzo are drawing pensions as former public employees. \u00a0Rizzo retired from the Torrance Police Officer Association.\u00a0 His estimated pension is listed publically <a href=\"http:\/\/transparentcalifornia.com\/pensions\/search\/?q=Geoffrey+Rizzo&amp;a=&amp;y=&amp;s=\" target=\"_blank\">here<\/a> at an amount of nearly $167,000 per year.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The City Council is expected to formally approve this coming Tuesday a labor agreement with AFSCME and two smaller collective bargaining units representing library employees and crossing guards.\u00a0 The agreement includes a $261,000 thousand payment for retroactive pay and a three month accelerated promotion on the back end of the deal at a cost of $185,000.\u00a0 Former Mayor Scotto and<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-170","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p4WeYo-2K","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/torrancecitycouncil.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/torrancecitycouncil.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/torrancecitycouncil.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/torrancecitycouncil.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/torrancecitycouncil.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=170"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/torrancecitycouncil.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":179,"href":"https:\/\/torrancecitycouncil.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170\/revisions\/179"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/torrancecitycouncil.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=170"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/torrancecitycouncil.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=170"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/torrancecitycouncil.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=170"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}