Will the Council Appointment be Influenced by Partisan Politics?

Partisan politics played a significant role in the recent election even though the Council positions are supposedly non-partisan.  This was especially evident in the mayoral race as the two republicans effectively split the vote opening the door for democrat Pat Furey to take the election.  With the upcoming appointment, it is likely that partisanship will once again affect the outcome.

Twelve individuals submitted applications to receive appointment to the council position.  The one that would probably engender the most support in the community is Leilani Kimmel-Dagastino.  Many would consider her the people’s choice after she finished 5^th in the recent election.  As a women and a minority she would also bring needed diversity to the Council.  Perhaps in an attempt to curry favor with the Council, she stressed in her application that during the recent election she “did not say anything bad about the current council or any of my fellow candidates.”

The 6^th and 7^th place finishers in the election would also bring diversity to the Council.  Restaurant owner and former rocket scientist Alex See could be a voice for the Asian business community.  The Council could also choose to make history by appointing Milton Herring who would be the first member of the black community to serve on the Council.

All of the above choices, however, were heavily backed by the Republican Party in the recent election.  Mayor Furey, as well as recently elected Councilmembers Weideman and Goodrich, are democrats.  Mayor Furey, and the other democrats, will almost certainly want to appoint someone that adheres to their same political ideology to ensure they have the votes on the Council to fulfill their agenda.  This may be the reason why other names have surfaced as possible appointees.

An appointee that will likely be more acceptable to the democrats and that will also bring the needed diversity to the Council is Ray Uchima.  His selection, however, may now be tainted by rumors in the community that a back door deal was cut several weeks ago in a “pay for play” scheme to make him the appointee.  In his application, Uchima touted his ability to “attract High Technology and Solar Electric Industries to Torrance” that will provide high paying jobs in the community and replace those jobs that will be lost with Toyota’s departure.

To avoid the controversy surrounding Uchima, the Council may opt for one of several intriguing compromise candidates.  The most well known of these is probably recently retired City Clerk Sue Herbers.  Sue reiterated several times in her application that she “will not under any circumstances seek a seat in the 2016 election” and that her decisions on the Council would be based “on the best interests of the City and not for any future political gain.”

Jimmy Gow also offered himself as an appointee.  As the current President of the Torrance Democratic Club he campaigned hard on behalf of Furey, Goodrich and Weideman and was instrumental to their success.  He claims he would bring a commitment to “uniting the members of the Council in a non-partisan partnership.”  That assertion, however, is hard to believe given his current role in the Democratic Party and the list of references he provided that includes such names as Maxine Waters, Janice Hahn, Al Muratsuchi, Betsy Butler, and Sandra Fluke.

Should the Council want to avoid partisan politics completely, then Mike Griffiths would make an attractive choice.  He was the highest finishing non-party affiliated candidate in the recent election and brings a wealth of City experience as a current Planning Commissioner and a previous lengthy stint on the Environmental Commission.

Recent candidates Rahmat Kahn and Ryan Mand also applied for appointment.  Rahmat Kahn shot himself in the foot with falsified endorsements in the past election and Ryan Mand continues to make a name for himself by showing up for council meetings in his now signature chicken suit costume.

The slate of applicants is rounded out by Environmental Quality Commissioner Charles Deemer, Cable TV Commissioner William Dan Feliz, and retiree Mario Obejas.

Should the Council not be able to come to a consensus they still have the option of placing the burden on the public through a special election.  The main deterrent to this option continues to be cost.  Though it will likely be expensive, the exact costs of this option are not known as the Council has not sought firm quotes from potential vendors for the various means (i.e. vote by mail, vote by precinct) that could be utilized to conduct a special election.